WebPoorer white matter microstructure predicts slower and more variable reaction time performance: evidence for a neural noise hypothesis in a large lifespan cohort ... (FA) to predict mean levels and variability in reaction time performance on a simple behavioral task using a dynamic structural equation model (DSEM). By modeling robust and ... WebApr 7, 2024 · This study aimed to enhance the real-time performance and accuracy of vigilance assessment by developing a hidden Markov model (HMM). Electrocardiogram (ECG) signals were collected and processed to remove noise and baseline drift. A group of 20 volunteers participated in the study. Their heart rate variability (HRV) was measured to …
Predicting response time variability from task and resting-state ...
WebAug 29, 2012 · Most studies of reaction time variability implicitly assume that heightened reaction time variability reflects occasional lapses in attention, and the dominant neurophysiological interpretation suggests this variability is linked to intrusions of task-negative brain network activity during task performance. WebObjective: Mean speed of responding is the most commonly used measure in the assessment of reaction time (RT). An alternative measure is intraindividual variability (IIV): the inconsistency of responding across multiple trials of a test. IIV has been suggested as an important indicator of central nervous system functioning, and as such, there has been … superior court of california county of marin
Frontiers Heterogeneous Indicators of Cognitive Performance …
WebSep 1, 2024 · Reaction time variability is the trial to trial fluctuation in response time to a given task [7]. Reaction time variability is thought to occur due to fluctuations in the … WebJan 1, 2024 · Inconsistency; Reaction time variability; Within-person variability Definition Intraindividual variability is broadly defined as the fluctuation in an individual’s cognitive performance over time. WebOct 15, 2012 · Reaction time variability was measured as the standard deviation of participants’ reaction time for correct answers on the two nonshifting trials in the Navon-like task and correct answers on the go/no-go task (see descriptions above). Individual scores were standardized and aggregated into one composite score (r = .36–.65, p < .001). superior court of california court index